Hell, even Oblivion has technical virtuosity, though it's hard to spot. I mean, shit, did you know Todd Howard, of all people, designed the first game with mouselook as we understand it today instead of springlook? It's true! Terminator Future Shock, look it up, I shit you not.īethesda was, at one point, legendary for innovation and pushing forward RPGs. The problem with this take is Morrowind was incontrovertibly a fuckin' masterpiece, and Daggerfall was a technical triumph. I am optimistic about both of their upcoming big games, but they definitely have as much to prove now as they did when only a niche group of nerds knew they existed. I like to think they know this, and have for some time. Other devs and pubs have shown that they can not only compete but innovate in the market that Skyrim spearheaded (in the modern mass market.) They are no longer the sole provider, and as often happens with sole providers who face new competition, they will have to shore up their weaknesses and compete with the competition or tip their hats to the new norm, and other devs (Larian, Obsidian) have taken up the mantle they dropped in regard to preserving the nerdery inherent in WRPGs. It was also one of the first examples I (as a huge ES fan) noticed regarding streamlining and simplifying things for a bigger, less nerdy demographic. It also went bigger than anyone else was willing to go at the time, so that was, ahem, huge.
#Es daggerfall noclip mods
Oblivion was a mess, but it was still on the front-facing fringes of the medium in some ways, and was adventurous just for being an Elder Scrolls game pre-Skyrim that also did some thing better than Skyrim (not a lot, but some.) Skyrim was a mess, but it found a sweet spot and hit at a time when user mods were hitting bigger numbers than ever. Morrowind was a fucking mess, but it was pushing boundaries in BIG ways, and they went IN on worldbuilding and stories. I think they can do this, but one of two things will have to happen, especially in the, ahem, fallout of 76:ġ) They innovate so much more that the broken parts that result are still just charming and fixable by fans,Ģ) They actually make an open world RPG that isn't a fucking mess that fans need to make serviceable, and it retains the engaging parts of what made all the ES games beloved, mods aside. In the era of BotW and AC:O and even ESO, which is imo the best Elder Scrolls game since Morrowind me idgaf, brehs) they have to step up their formula at least just as much as the devs of those aforementioned games did when developing those games and entering a genre in which they didn't have a pre-established dominance.
#Es daggerfall noclip full
the reason the world started caring about BGS) is this: it was a milestone game in a lot of ways, but it got away with a LOT of shit because most folks were like "well, yeah, it's full of broken shit and there are a handful of questionable design decisions, but it's so big and open!" If they don't deliver with ES6 and/or Starfield, they are kinda screwed as a developer, but I hope they will not drop the ball here, because they can't afford to. And each one has been less enjoyable than the last for a while now. New Vegas and Outer Worlds will be titles I can almost always return to and actually play different characters on, whereas Bethesda's internal output at this time are one and done adventures I eventually tire of before I've even seen all the content. The Outer Worlds is to Fallout 4 what New Vegas was to 3, a game that shows me how really damn hard it is to go back to a less interesting title. They still occasionally sneak some great stuff in, but it has become less and less frequent in addition to their games just not holding up as well upon revisits once you get past the sheen you had at the moment of playing. The last time it felt like Bethesda was really paying more attention to that was Oblivion and everything since then has slowly regressed further and further in terms of character building and the personality of the game. Bethesda is too scared you might accidentally break something (somewhat ironically) or not experience something, whereas Obsidian almost always encourages you to experiment and go outside of the lines of their quests. Obsidian continually reminds us that good writing is a key ingredient of these titles and that player choice is an essential element of an actual Role Playing Game. Are any of them masterpieces or where they ever really masterpieces once you got past the hype of the moment? Not really. Are Skyrim, Fallout 3, and Fallout 4 enjoyable games with potentially lots of content and interesting worlds to explore? Yes. I wouldn't say Bethesda is so much obsolete as I don't think they've ever quite earned the credit they have gotten from the gaming community.
0 kommentar(er)
